Organizations define their hurdle rateas the minimum "rate of return" they will consider when evaluating investment and action proposals.
- Proposals that score above the hurdle rate may receive further consideration.
- Proposals scoring below the hurdle rate receive no further consideration.
In other words, when its rate of return clears the hurdle, the proposal qualifies for funding consideration.
The Hurdle Rate Role in Proposal Review
Action proposals almost always contain projected financial results. And, they almost always present these as a cash flow stream. Hence, nearly all action proposals predict a series of cash flow events that follow the investment or action.
Reviewers evaluate proposals with the help of financial metrics for analyzing cash flows. They are concerned with proposal acceptance and funding, after all, and they turn to measures that take an "investment view." Consequently, they will probably analyze with net present value, return on investment, payback, and internal rate of return. In brief, all of these are relevant in a thorough review. Also, a thorough review also finds and measures investment risks. And, finally, a thorough review also addresses this question: "Do the predicted outcomes align with strategic objectives?"
The hurdle rate serves in this context as an initial screening test. The hurdle rate test, therefore, usually precedes the full proposal review. The idea is to filter out, or disqualify, weak proposals, early. Reviewers, therefore, have more time and resources to focus on the stronger submitted proposals.
Explaining Hurdle rate in Context
Following sections further describe the use of direct and hurdle rates. Examples appear in the context of related terms and concepts including the following:
- What is a hurdle rate?
- How do organizations applying the hurdle rate test?
- How do firms find the elusive "Rate of Return?"
- How does the "Internal rate of return" serve as a hurdle rate?
- Whose proposals have to clear the hurdles Tests?
- For more on "Internal rate of return" IRR and "Modified internal rate of return" MIRR, see the article Internal Rate of Return.
- See the article Financial Metrics for an introduction to all essential cash flow metrics and financial statement metrics (Business Metrics, or Business ratios).
- For more on the role of business case analysis in financial justification, see the article Business Case.
- First, the test requires the arbitrarily chosen hurdle rate, itself.
- Secondly, the test needs the "rate of return" promised by the proposal.
Note also that the test has only two possible outcomes:
- Proposal rate of return clears the hurdle.
- Proposal rate of return does not clear the hurdle.
Choosing the hurdle rate
Financial officers are free to set the hurdle rate as any figure they wish. Usually, they use the organization's weighted average cost of capital (WACC). In principle, they could just as well use other company metrics. Some, in fact, do use metrics such as return on capital employed, return on assets, or return on equity. Most choose WACC as the hurdle rate, however. They probably select WACC because these same officers will also find a predicted "Internal rate of return" (IRR) for the proposal. The hurdle test, then, compares proposal IRR to the WACC hurdle rate.
Incidentally, using IRR and WACC together this way is standard practice in finance. In brief, when investment IRR is higher than WACC, those with financial training usually see the investment as a net gain. And, when IRR is less than WACC, they view it as a net loss.
Note once more that financial officers are free to set the hurdle rate as they wish. They select the hurdle rate they want to, hurdle rate plays no role in financial accounting or reporting. Consequently, hurdle rate practice need not conform to GAAP or government reporting rules. Therefore, financial officers can apply subjective judgments, draw upon their experience, and adjust the hurdle rate to something other than WACC. They may lift the hurdle rate by several percentage points, for instance, when they believe a proposal is risky.
Note also that the hurdle rate has several other names. It may be called a "minimum acceptable rate of return" (MARR), or "required rate of return," or just "target rate."
Textbooks use the term "rate of return" to describe the hurdle rate. Here, they have in mind an economic metric based on financial results in the proposal. The analyst will compare this result to the existing hurdle rate.
One problem, however, is that "rate of return," does not have a standard definition. And, the term does not designate any metric in particular. For the hurdle rate test, therefore, financial specialists usually turn to one metric that does have a standard definition. The metric of choice for this purpose is the internal rate of return (IRR).
IRR has several mathematical definitions, but the best known is this:
The internal rate of return is the interest rate for which the net present value of all proposal cash flows equals 0.
This definition, by the way, is not a formula for calculating IRR. More accurately, it is a guide for finding IRR.
- One approach is to approximate IRR with a graphical solution. Here, cash flow NPV is plotted as a function of discounting interest rate. IRR then stands out as the rate with NPV = 0.
- More often, however, business people use spreadsheets to find IRR. in Microsoft Excel, therefore, a cell showing an IRR result holds a formula like this: "=IRR(B2:B:11,0.1)"
- "B2:B11" is a spreadsheet range of ten cells. Each holds a net cash flow figure. And, together, these are the proposal cash flow stream.
- "0.1" is an initial guess for the IRR. This guess merely serves as a starting point for approximation trials. Tests continue until it finds a rate that produces NPV=0. Trials continue until it finds a rate that produces NPV=0. The spreadsheet finds this solution very quickly. For the spreadsheet user, IRR results seem to appear instantly.
See the online article "Internal Rate of Return"for more on finding and using IRR.
Note, finally, that not everyone uses the proposal IRR for the hurdle rate test. Some define "rate of return" using other metrics that are easier to interpret. Some may use simple return on investment (ROI), while others use the "Average rate of return" metric. Stil,l others choose another metric.
The hurdle rate concept is best known for its role in capital budgeting. However, the idea is used in other business processes, as well. In fact, the hurdle rate can turn up anywhere that managers receive, evaluate, and prioritize proposals. As a result, the hurdle rate test can appear in all of these areas:
Capital Budgeting and Capital Review
Capital budgeting typically begins with a "capital review" at the start of a capital budget cycle. For this, a Capital Review Committee solicits spending proposals, organization-wide, for capital acquisitions and capital projects. And, they also set a limit for total capital spending (a capital spending ceiling). Usually, the funding request total exceeds the capital spending ceiling. Incoming proposals, therefore, must compete for available funds, and those submitting proposals know that the Committee will not fund all submitted requests. As a result, the Review Committee's primary tasks are to evaluate and prioritize all incoming submissions. For each proposal, evaluation begins with the hurdle rate test.
Project Management Office
PMOs in some organizations receive a large number of project proposals. The result is a heavy evaluation workload for a few PMO officers. Consequently, many apply the hurdle rate test to each income proposal, first. Those that clear the hurdle then move on to a thorough review and further consideration. The rest are non-starters.
Product Management Office
Proposals for new products can reach high volume. Companies usually expect to bring only a small percentage of these to market. The in-depth review of product proposals will examine many factors. These will include marketing and sales considerations, of course, as well as the company's overall product strategy. Before reaching the in-depth review, however, proposal sponsors may have to submit to the hurdle test.
Information Technology Directors
IT departments usually support units across the entire organization. As a result, IT directors often receive a substantial number of proposals. These may include, for example, requests for new devices, new applications, new IT capabilities, or various IT projects.
Most IT units, however, do not have the time and resources for meeting all incoming requests. Consequently, IT directors spend much of their own time evaluating and prioritizing IT support requests. Therefore, many IT directors now require business case support with incoming proposals. And, they may choose to assess fully only those proposals that pass the hurdle rate test.
Continuous Improvement & Innovation Groups
Continuous Improvement / Innovation Groups. Some organizations create groups chartered specifically to facilitate "continuous improvement" or "innovation." These groups also receive action proposals from across the organization. And, such proposals typically vary substantially, in nature, size, and scope.
Group members will then evaluate incoming proposals regarding feasibility, risks, and added value to the organization. As a result, this calls for a substantial time and resources from group members. However, they can use the hurdle rate test to disqualify weak proposals early.