Deliver Credibility, Accuracy, Practical Value
Building the Business Case
Solution Matrix Ltd®

Financial Structure, Capital Structure Capitalization, Leverage
Definitions, Meaning Explained, Usage, Example Calculations


Company capital and financial structures consist of Balance sheet liabilities and equities. These structures are the mechanisms by which owners and creditors share risks and rewards in proportion to their share of company funding.

Capital and financial structures set the firm's level of leverage. Leverage, in turn, determines how creditors and owners share business risks and rewards.

What are Financial and Capital Structures?

Business people use the term structure in quite a few different ways. The terms "governance," "business," and "legal," are all associated with their own "structures" for instance. These refer to aspects of company set up and operation.

Two other similar terms describe the nature of the company's financial position: Financial structure and capital structure.

Both structures concern the "Liabilities + Equities" side of the Balance sheet equation:

Assets = Liabilities + Equities.

  • Financial structure refers to the balance between all of the company's liabilities and its equities. It thus concerns the entire "Liabilities+Equities" side of the Balance sheet.
  • Capital structure, by contrast, refers to the balance between equities and long term liabilities. Short term liabilities do not contribute to capital structure.

For comparing the firm's debt to its equities, financial structure is therefore more sensitive than capital structure to short term liabilities. Financial structure, that is, reflects the status of working capital and cash flow, salaries payable, accounts payable, and taxes payable. Capital structure does not.

Capital structure, on the other hand, refers to the makeup of the company's underlying value. Here, capital structure focuses on the balance between funding from equities and funding from long term debt. The presumption is that firms use funds from both sources to acquire income-producing assets. Capital structure is also known as capitalization.

Explaining Structures and Leverage in Context

Sections below further define, explain, and illustrate structures and leverage. Note especially that the term appears in context with related terms and concepts, including the following:

Financial Leverage
Capital Leverage
Optimal Debt Level
Business Risk
Leverage Impact on EBIT
Gearing Ratios
Total Debt to Equity
Long Term Debt to Equity
Leverage Impact on ROE
Leverage Impact on EPS
Financial Risk



Related Topics

  • Explaining financial leverage and leverage metrics. See the article Leverage.
  • Explaining and Illustrating asset structure. See the article Asset Structure.
  • For more on the several meanings of capital in business, finance, and economics, see the article Capital.

Financial and Capital Structures On the Balance Sheet
Structures Represent Balance Sheet Liabilibilities and Equities

Exhibit 1 shows how financial and capital structures appear on a firm's Balance sheet. 

Grande Corporation                            Figures in $1,000's
Balance Sheet at 31 December 20YY   
Current Assets
LT Investments & Funds
Property, Plant & Equip
Intangible Assets
Other Assets
Total Assets



Current Liabilities

  Long Term Liabilities
Total Liabilities
Contributed Capital
Retained Earnings
Total Owners Equity



Total Liabilities & Equities
               Financial Structure


Exhibit 1. The components of asset structure, financial structure, and capital structure (capitalization) all appear on the firm's Balance sheet.

Groups of Balance sheet items define three structures for the firm:

  • Firstly, Asset structure.
  • Secondly, Financial structure.
  • Thirdly, Capital structure (Capitalization).

For the analyst, describing and evaluating each structure is largely a matter of comparing the relative magnitudes of items within the structure.

  • Financial and capital structures show how investor owners share risks and rewards of company performance. As a result, these structures describe leverage.
  • Asset structure shows how the firm chooses to maximize return on assets ROA.

For more on the role of structures in sharing risks and rewards, see the section below: The meaning of leverage for investors and lenders.

For more on asset structure, see the article Asset Structure.

Defining, Explaining, Measuring Financial Structure
Metrics for Measuring Financial Leverage

Financial structure describes the sourcing of all funds a company uses for acquiring assets and paying expenses.  

Financial Structure Funds Sources

There are only two kinds of sources for all such funds:

  • Firstly, Debt financing.
    Firms acquire funds through debt financing, primarily from bank loans and the sale of bonds. These normally appear first on the Balance sheet as Long term liabilities. Note especially that the company's debt (Balance sheet liabilities) also includes near term debts such as short term notes payable, accounts payable, salaries payable, and taxes payable.  
  • Secondly, Owners equities.
    These are what the company owns outright, appearing on the Balance sheet under "Equities" (or "Stockholders Equities"). And, equities, in turn, come from two sources:
    • Paid in capital.
      These are payments the firm receives for stock shares investors purchase directly from the firm when it issues shares.
    • Retained earnings.
      Retained earnings are after-tax profits (earnings) the company retains after paying dividends to shareholders.

These sources taken together are one full "side" of the Balance sheet. Businesspeople interested in the firm's financial structure will compare the percentages of total funding from each source. The relative percentages define the company's financial leverage, which determines how owners and creditors share business performance risks and rewards.

     Defining and Measuring Financial Leverage

One primary measure of the balance between funding sources is a leverage metric, the Total debt to equities ratio. This is sometimes called simply the Debt to equities ratio, or even more simply the Debt ratio. And, the metric is viewed as a measure of financial leverage, or Trading on equity. Note that a similar but different leverage metric, the "Long term debt to equities ratio" appears in the section below on calculating capital leverage.

Some textbooks symbolize this ratio as B / V, where B is the company's total debt and V is company value, or total equities. And, some prefer to symbolize the same ratio as D/E, where D is total debt and E is total equities.

Calculating the Total Debt to Equities Ratio (Financial Leverage)

The total debt to equities ratio results from entries on the firm's Balance sheet. Figures for this example are from the "Financial Structure" region of Exhibit 1, above. 

For Grande Corporation, at the end of the reporting period:

Total liabilities = $8,938,000
Stockholder equities = $13,137,000

Total debt to equities ratio (B / V):

B / V  = Total liabilities / Stockholders equities
          = $8,938,000 / $13,137,000
          = 0.68

Increasing debt funding has two results. Firstly, the debt to equities ratio increases. And, secondly, the firm's financial structure leverage increases. 

For the implications of different leverage values, see the section below: What does leverage do for Investors?

Defining, Explaining, Measuring Capital Structure
Metrics for Measuring Capitalization

Capital structure describes the sources of funds a company uses for acquiring income-producing assets. The focus on these funds contrasts with the financial structure concept (previous section) which includes all of the company's debt and equities.

Regarding debt, Capital structure considers instead only the firm's long term liabilities. As Exhibit 1 shows, capital structure items lie on the "Liabilities + Equities" side of the Balance sheet, but exclude Current Liabilities.

Those with an interest in a firm's capital structure will compare the percentages of total funding for income-producing assets that comes from each source. They want to know, that is, whether capital funding is primarily equity funding or debt funding.  

     Defining and Measuring Capital Leverage

One measure of the balance between capital funding sources is another leverage metric, the Long term debt to equities ratio. Obviously, this ratio is very similar to the financial leverage metric above. However, this ratio, using only long term debt, serves to measure the firm's capital leverage.

Calculating the Long Term Debt to Equities Ratio (Capital Leverage)

Like the other metric, above, based on total debt, the Long term debt to equities ratio derives from entries on the firm's Balance sheet. Figures for this example appear in the "Capital Structure" region of Exhibit 1above:

For Grande Corporation, at the end of the reporting period:

Total Long term liabilities = $5,474,000
Stockholder equities = $13,137,000

Total Long term debt to Equities ratio
       = Total Long term liabilities / Stockholders equities
       = $5,474,000/ $13,137,000
       = 0.42

The greater the debt funding component (the higher the long term debt to equities ratio), the higher the degree of leverage in the company's capital structure.

Note that Grande Corporation's capital leverage (0.42) is lower than it's financial leverage (0.68). Financial leverage will in fact always be greater than capital leverage, except in the very unlikely case that the firm has no short term debt.

For more on the implications of different leverage values see the section immediately below on Risk and gearing ratios. And see also the section on below on Leverage Consequences for Investors.

Leverage Benefits and Risks
Business Risk, Financial Risk, and Gearing Ratios

A high degree of leverage has several implications for owners and for creditors.

  • Firstly, if and only if business performance is good (as in a good economy), the following holds: High leverage provides owners with greater profitability and a higher return on investment (or return on equity), than low leverage.
  • Secondly, when business is poor, high leverage gives owners lower profits and lower return on equity, compared to higher leverage.
  • Thirdly, the higher the degree of leverage the higher the potential rewards and also the higher the potential loss for owners.

Business Risk

One consequence of high leverage is business risk. Here, the term refers to the risk of low earnings. Analysts typically define business risk for a firm as follows:

Business risk = Potential variability of before-tax earnings from assets

     "Before-tax earnings from assets" = EBIT (earnings before interest and taxes)
     "Potential variability" = A range of possible EBIT results

When leverage is high, business risk is high. And, when business risk is high, the range of possible EBIT results is large. And, with low business risk, potential EBIT results cover a much narrower range.

Financial Risk

Analysts also take interest in a second risk factor that accompanies high leverage, financial risk. This is the risk that a firm might not be able to meet its financial obligations. Not surprisingly, financial risk rises when the debt level rises. And, this means that financial risk increases as leverage increases.

Note that from its EBIT, a firm must first pay interest due on loans, bonds, and other debt service, before paying shareholder dividends or retaining earnings. With higher leverage, the firm simply has more debt service to pay. When earnings are low, therefore, the firm with high leverage risks being unable to meet it's financial obligations. Not surprisingly, when a company has high financial risk, its credit ratings and bond ratings suffer.

Gearing Ratios for Leverage Metrics

Analysts commonly use the term gearing ratio when working with leverage metrics. The term "gearing" is inspired by mechanical gearing, where a smaller gear wheel gains leverage (power) by turning a larger wheel. Similarly, in business, owners and their relatively smaller equity gain leverage to bring in larger earnings by using relatively more debt financing (higher gearing).

In any case, the term gearing ratio may refer to at least 4 different metrics:

  1. Total debt to equity ratio, where B = total debt and V = "Value," or Total Equity.
    For more on this metric, see the section above under Financial Structure)
  2. Total debt to total assets (total debt / total assets). This ratio appears in textbooks as B/TA, where B = total debt and TA = total assets. For more on this metric, see Liability Metrics.
  3. Total stockholders equities times interest earned (EBIT / total interest).
    For more on this metric, see Leverage Metrics.
  4. Equity ratio (equity / assets).
    For more on this metric, see Leverage Metrics.

Examples in the next section show how high leverage can bring high owner returns (high earnings per share, high return on equity) if sales revenues are strong. They also show how profits and owner returns suffer in a high leverage company when sales are weak. 

What Does Leverage Do for investors?

Sections above discuss the impacts of capital structure, financial structure, and leverage, on owner/investor gains. The ways these factors interact are probably easiest to grasp in the context of a concrete example.

The numerical example in this section shows the potential impact of leverage and sales performance as they affect investor gains and losses. Exhibit 2, below, also shows how company earnings are impacted. The next section shows how to measure the risks that go with different sales and leverage figures.

Example: Investor Gains and Losses as a Function of Leverage and Earnings

This example considers four levels of sales performance, and the resulting investor gains or losses at four degrees of leverage.

Example Sales Levels

Consider first the before-tax earnings (Earnings before interest and taxes, EBIT) that a company expects under each of four possible levels of sales revenues.

Management believes there is a very small but real probability that sales next year will be 0. This could result from a crippling labor strike, or a natural disaster (such as an earthquake), or the loss of several major law suits pending against the company. They also estimate 3 other levels of sales, ranging from "Low" to "High." Each column of Exhibit 2, below, shows the impacts for investors under one of following levels of sales:

  • 0 sales: $0 in sales bringing –$5,000 EBIT. Column 1.
  • Low sales: $15,000,000 in sales bringing $4,000,000 EBIT. Column 2.
  • Medium sales: $30,000,000 in sales bringing $13,000,000 EBIT. Column 3.
  • High sales, $45,000,000 in sales bringing $25,000,000 EBIT. Column 4

Example Levels of Leverage and Impact on EPS and ROE

This Exhibit 2 example below shows the impact of sales revenues and leverage on three metrics that represent investor gains:

What will be the impact of sales revenues on investor earnings per share and return on equity? The answer is: That depends on the financial structure of the company, especially the degree of leverage.  Exhibits 2 and 3 show these impacts at four different leverage structures:

  • 0 leverage
  • Low leverage
  • Medium leverage
  • High leverage

"Leverage" in Exhibit 2 is represented by two gearing ratios, or leverage metrics described above:  Total debt to Equity (B/V)  and Total Debt to Total assets (B/TA).  These derive directly from the figures above for Total assets (TA), Total debt (B), and Total equity (V). Leverage starts at 0 for the top panel, and then moves higher in lower panels. For the four panels, B/V ranges goes from 0 to Total debt to equity (B/V) ranges from 0.0 to 3.00, while the debt to assets ratio ranges from 0.0 to 0.75.

Example: Leverage Impact Results


Exhibit 2. Each of the four panels in this table shows how EBIT turns into (1) net earnings after taxes, (2) earnings per share (EPS), and (3) shareholder return on equity (ROE). Comparing these metrics across leverage and sales revenues send several unmistakable messages, which are easier read from the graphical images in Exhibit 3, below:


Exhibit 3. Graphs showing the impact of leverage and sales levels on EPS and ROE.

The four graphs in Exhibit 3 represent the table figures from in Exhibit 2. All four graphs show:

  • The impact of leverage on investor gains is about the same, regardless of which leverage metric is in view (B/V or B/TA).
  • The impact of leverage on investor gains is about the same, regardless of which investor gain metric is in view (EPS or ROE).

The four lines in each graph each represent a different level of sales revenues, ranging from 0 sales at bottom, to high sales at top. Regarding sales revenues, the graphs show the following:

  • In all four graphs, the plotted lines bunch closely together at left (0 leverage) and then fan out moving right towards higher leverage.

    This clearly shows that investors have much more to gain, as well as much more to lose under high leverage. Considering just the top graph, Earnings per share vs. Debt to Equity (EPS vs. B/V):
    • At 0 leverage, the range of possible EPS returns is small.  At 0 leverage, EPS ranges from negative to positive, from –$16.25 (with 0 sales) to  $81.25, a range of $97.50.
    • The range of possible EPS returns is about three times larger under high leverage. Under high leverage, EPS ranges from negative to positive, from –$91.49 to $298.51, a range of $390.00.

Notes on Exhibit 2 Results.

All four structures have exactly the same asset total asset book value ($22,075,000).  In other words, all four structures have the same "Asset side" of the Balance sheet.

What differs between structures is the other side of the Balance sheet: Shareholder Equity + Liabilities must, of course equal the asset's $22,075,000. Note especially, however, that the four levels of leverage distribute that total differently between equities and debt.

Each structure has the same equity value per share of stock outstanding ($110).  However, as the size of the equity component decreases (going from 0 leverage to high leverage), the number of shares outstanding also decreases.

When is There Too Much Debt? Too Little Debt?
Why is Too Much or Too Little Debt a Problem?

Several groups have a keen interest in knowing a firm's financial and capital structure:

  • Firstly, lenders considering making loans to the company.
  • Secondly, investors considering buying the firm's securities
  • Thirdly, officers and senior managers, considering the acquisition and use of funds

All will want to judge whether the company is carrying "too much" or "too little" debt. 

Too Much Debt

A company has too much debt when debt service costs are burdensome, that is, when

  • The company cannot readily pay interest due on its bonds and bank loans.
  • When debt service costs reduce net income to an unacceptable level.
  • When there is a high risk the company will default on its loans and/or bonds.

In a high leverage company, the risk of these unpleasant outcomes rises if profits and profitability decrease or if the general economy enters a period of low growth.

In conclusion, high levels of leverage are dangerous in a poor economy or any other time when a company's earning prospects are poor.

Too Little Debt

A firm is probably carrying too little debt when these conditions exist:

  • There is a credible opportunity to grow revenues and profits by increasing investments in income-producing assets
  • There is a credible opportunity to grow revenues and profits by increasing spending for research and development, marketing, infrastructure renewal/modernization, or reorganization.
  • Earnings and equity funding are not providing sufficient funds to pursue these opportunities.
  • The company should be able to pay additional debt-service expenses, without lowering profits unacceptably. 

In brief, increasing leverage may be advisable when the company can readily afford additional debt service costs, and when additional loans enable investments that promise a good return. "Good returns" are returns that outweigh the costs of borrowing.

Acceptable Leverage Metrics and Target Leverage Metrics

In deciding whether the company's capital structure brings leverage that is either too high or too low, investors will consider several factors. They will compare the firm's earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) to:

  • Firstly, Industry standard EBIT. 
    Comparing company EBIT to EBIT for other companies in the same industry indicates whether or not the company's earning power in its own industry is strong. 
  • Secondly, Net earnings (earnings after taxes and interest). 
    Comparing EBIT to Net earnings for the same period indicate whether or not financing costs (interest) are reducing profits to an unacceptably low level.

In addition, in deciding whether the debt load is too high or too low, investors will also consider other factors. They may, for instance, compare the firm's debt/equity ratios to industry standards. Note that industry norms or standards vary greatly between industries.

  • Companies in capital intensive industries such as automobile manufacturing, for instance, often finance capital assets through debt. And this results in long term debt to equity ratios greater than 1.0.
  • Companies in the technology sector, by contrast, typically have ratios on the order of 0.20 - 0.40.

Finally, investor analysts will also evaluate carefully factors such as these:

  • Trends or recent changes in the company's financial structure and capital structure.  They will want to know whether the reasons for significant changes were temporary (or one-time). 
  • Individual sources of the company's debt as well as total debt. This helps explain the actual cost of debt service, risk of default, and the company's prospects for re-negotiating debt if necessary.
  • The company's likely earnings performance for the foreseeable future. This should be adequate for debt service and still provide acceptable retained earnings or shareholder dividends.

Capital Structure and Sharing Risks and Rewards

Capital structure, moreover, shows how risks and gains are divided between investor owners and investor creditors:

  • If a firm with high leverage fails and enters bankruptcy, creditors will probably take the larger loss. This is because the company may have to write off its loan debt, and bondholders may find their securities worthless.
  • On the other hand if a company with very low debt-to-equity ratios fails, it will likely pay off its creditors. When a bankrupt company liquidates, creditors have preference over shareholders in receiving liquidation funds. As a result, a low debt-to-equity ratio means there will probably be enough funding to cover outstanding obligations

How Do Firms Change Capital and Financial Structure?

For most companies, financial structure and capital structure change by small amounts more or less continuously. This is because the values of several structural components may be especially fluid from period to period:  short term liabilities, long term liabilities, and even retained earnings, for instance.

For the short term, a company can deliberately increase leverage by taking out loans or issuing bonds. It can abruptly decrease leverage and increase equity by issuing and selling new shares of stock. Absent these actions, a profitable profit-making company will gradually reduce leverage as long term loans and bonds are paid off, and as retained earnings from profits grow.